Sunday, February 26, 2006

Will Yahoo Let Google Buy Sun?

Blogcritics.org: Is Google About To Buy Sun Microsystems?: "Google is about to buy Sun Microsystems.Last year Google announced a potential partnership with the ailing technology giant and has since announced such a deal with Dell - such announcements indicate a need for more technological capacity on Google's part than they currently have. And they could hardly be better placed right now to acquire those capacities."

Yahoo will be pretty stupid if it lets Google Buy Sun.
Frank
  post to Del.icio.us

India ready to feed the hand that bites

It’s time for an Indian rival to Google- The Economic Times: "The erosion of trust towards the US-based internet companies on the question of privacy offers an opportunity for others to step in and India is ideally placed to offer those substitutes.

WHO is illegally downloading thousands of copyrighted songs? Who is sending threatening e-mail to a teenager? Who is saying disparaging things about the ruling party on an Internet message board? These questions, and many more like them, are being asked every day of the companies that provide internet service and run web sites."


Should an Indian company become a Google rival, do you think Americans will trust it?
  post to Del.icio.us

Sunday, February 19, 2006

WebmasterWorld or WebloserWorld?

Jen Sense has been blocked on WebmasterWorld.
Reason 423 why webmasterworld is dying a fast death : Shoemoney Marketing Thoughts

"WMW is just full of **** (you get it). It's the best living example of a good community gone bad.

Yet another stupid decision by folks who *think* they know all. If they would stop kissing ass of G and other engines, and use their brain, they might have a future.

BT, IMO is the best example of a guy being self centered. Charging members but not providing a search function.

May be it's time WMW should change its name to WebloserWorld.

Frank
"
  post to Del.icio.us

Monday, February 13, 2006

Yahoo, Google Fail to attend meeting on Internet Censorship

Yahoo! speaks out on Chinese censorship - WebWatch - Breaking Business and Technology News at silicon.com: "Earlier this month US politicians attacked Cisco, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! for failing to attend a meeting on internet censorship."


And some wrongfully think that search engines are all good.
Frank
  post to Del.icio.us

Sunday, February 12, 2006

Privacy: Going Once, Going Twice, Gone

Did you know your privacy is up for sale? And the seller is no one else but the owner, you?

What's the cost of your privacy? You may think that it's priceless but is it really?

What if I said that the cost of your privacy is a few features? No way, you may reply, but isn't that the truth, especially if you are a passionate Google user like millions of other users? Feeding the company at the expense of your privacy? Helping it make billions as it bends down to communist governments while refusing to fullfil US government's legitimate requests?

Not only your privacy is for sale but also that of your business and your web site, and your friends, and your family.

In an earlier post I pointed out some of the tools Google uses to collect your personal data

1. Google Analytics: so we can spy on your traffic, referrals, surfing habits and eventually take over your market.
2. Google Mail: so we can know everything there is to know about your email usage patterns, including the conversation and chat history.
3. Google Mail for business: so we can get to know all your business secrets and eventually drive you off your own business.
4. Google Adsense: so we can give you a bait and then make your web site vanish from the SERPs.
5. Google Toolbar: so we can spy on you from the moment you open your web browser.
6. Google Pack: Some people are getting really knowledgeable about how we keep data about them and never delete that data. This really hurts our software installation on their computers. So to overcome that, we have partnered with Dell (and paid them $1bn) to have all our software pre-installed. This way people will just have our software installed and won't have to care about the term we like to refer at Googleplex as privacy. Our payment of $1bn to Dell should show our users how much we care about having our software installed on their computers.
7. Google Desktop Search: so we can just have your hard drive. It’s too painful to know about you in pieces, why don’t you just hand us over the hard drive.
8. Google Word Processor (Upcoming): You know all this knowledge we collect about you (and never delete) is really good but imagine how wonderful it will be if we could just know what you are thinking right when you are thinking about it. That's why with the release of our word processor, we will send all your typed documents to our servers as you type them so we can show you related ads (and so you can click on them like a good Net citizen). That way you won't even have to open the browser. Imagine, you start typing about "sex" or how your last night went, and we will start showing you related ads.


Some people are just damn smart. No matter what we do, they won't install our software.

Don't worry, Google protects your privacy very much and for that reason we will delete your information right when you delete it.

Oops, scratch the last point and please read it as follows:

1. "If you cancel your Google Account or uninstall Google Desktop, the files indexed in the Search Across Computers feature will no longer be accessible through Google Desktop and may remain on our servers for up to 60 days before being deleted".

We hope you agree that we should be allowed to keep your hard drive information for 60 more days. Remember we gave you the features to search your computer from multiple locations, and after all there is a cost for that.

And finally, we figured it would be really cool to know how and when you are visiting web sites even when you are just using our Desktop search. So for that reason, we put the following line in our privacy policy:


"... Google Desktop may send information about the websites that you visit ... ... collect a limited amount of non-personal information from your computer and send it to Google.

... This includes summary information, such as the number of searches you do"

Did you notice how cleverly we have put "non-personal information" in our privacy policy? All we hope is that you don't pay attention to the following lines in our privacy policy:

"Your copy of Google Desktop includes a unique application number. The unique application number is required for Google Desktop to work and cannot be disabled."

And we also hope you don't have the brain to put 2 and 2 together and realize that using the above mentioned application number with the various cookies we store on your computer + your Social Security Number that you gave us for AdSense + your Google Analytics account + your IP address + your Gmail account will eventually let us know a little bit more details about you than we mentioned. But that shouldn't surprise you as we are giving you free features and organizing the world's information for you.


--Frank

[The above is a work in progress]
  post to Del.icio.us

Google Desktop Search -- EFF's Attorney, Kevin Bankston writes back.

Worried about the privacy concerns of using Google Desktop Searh, I wrote to Kevin Bankston of EFF.

Dear Kevin,

Thank you for raising your voice against Google's Desktop Search Feature. As a software engineer and professional search engine consultant I would like to draw your attention to the possible motives behind Google offering this service, based on my experience.

The new Desktop feature is not about offering users a great service. It's about Google being able to predict more efficiently what type of ads users would click on.

Predicting what ads to show to consumers
So for example, lets say Joe uses Google Desktop Search Feature and as a result has the contents of his hard drive(s) stored on Google's server. Google can then not only actively monitor what content Joe has on his computer but also what content Joe created or accessed recently. If Joe, for instance, recently created or downloaded five documents about "web hosting", Google could predict that wherever Joe goes online, "web hosting" ads would be the ones that Joe is most likely to click on. Predicting users demand in this way can help Google rake in billions at the cost of mine and your privacy.

On the other hand if a user creates documents about pregnancy, or mentions keywords about "pregnancy" in their recent documents, Google could guess that the user is most likely to click on "pregnancy" related ads.

Many people use the same password for multiple services
As a professional consultant I am surprised to see how many people use the same password for multiple services, which is a very insecure practice. Some of these passwords are shared with other people (such as a web site owner who may share his passwords with his webmaster).

People who follow such insecure practice may open their entire computers to prying eyes, thanks to Google Desktop Search.

I once again appreciate your efforts in raising awareness about this important issue.

In case you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via this email address.

Frank Mash


To my surprise, and delight, Kevin wrote me back the very same day:

Hi [Frank]--thanks for writing. We actually mentioned the ad-scanning
threat in our PR, so we're with you on that. And although it was not
in our PR, we also are concerned about people using a single account
for multiple services--not only as a single point of failure in
security terms, but because it means they can track your behavior
across all of their services in a personally identifiable way. So, it
looks like we're on the same page, and thanks for your words of
support.

Kevin

So if you still choose to use the Google Desktop Search 3, know what you are getting into and the applicable risks to you.

--Frank
Tags: | |
  post to Del.icio.us

Gmail for your domain: Give Google All Your Company Secrets

Google is aparently testing a new Gmail for business since they couldn't think of a better and legal way to "spy" on your business secrets.

So if you haven't applied for their beta test yet, go and apply now so they can drive you quickly out of your own business at no cost to you.

And then people wonder how and why Google enters all these crazy industries.

Here's a comment I posted on Amr's blog:

Mr X,
People don't hate Google because they were denied jobs (Heck I created my resume for them and decided not to send it).

People hate Google because like others I believe that if there was one word to describe Google, it would be "parasite."

My five years of experience dealing with Google tells me that dealing with Google in any capacity is basically equal to shooting yourself in the foot. I would rather get a straight bullet rather than be left off dying over the years.

Look at the services Google provides:

1. Google Analytics: so we can spy on your traffic, referrals, surfing habits and eventually take over your market.
2. Google Mail: so we can know everything there is to know about your email usage patterns, including the conversation and chat history.
3. Google Mail for business: so we can get to know all your business secrets and eventually drive you off your own business.
4. Google Adsense: so we can give you a bait and then make your web site vanish from the SERPs.
5. Google Toolbar: so we can spy on you from the moment you open your web browser.

If you still don't get it, wait, and like others your eyes will be opened.

I mean come on. My worst decision in the last five years was to trust this company. All I got in return was regret.

Frank




Gmail
Google privacy
  post to Del.icio.us

No barrier to Google's low

It feels so good when industry professionals share the same thoughts. Amr, my second favorite blogger at Yahoo! (after Jeremy) writes in a post titled "How low can Google go":
Google is now testing longer abstracts for the ads above the web results, these abstracts go as long as 200 characters (2 to 4 lines on some screens). This is opposite to what Yahoo is doing, in mid January Yahoo moved towards shorter abstracts. The only reason to do longer abstracts for ads is to make more money by pushing the good web results further below the fold. The first time I heard about these longer abstract tests, I said to my self Google must be doing this for the adsense network, and then I was blown away to see them actually testing them on the main Google SERP."

Then Amr goes on to say:

It seems that Google ran out of innovations for the algorithms matching ads to queries, so now the main way to create more growth is to change their SERP.


Google literally destroyed a web site of mine after I made $67K in a year with them, without providing any reason. I wrote again and again to them but they kept sending me templated replies. They treated me worse than any company I have ever dealt with. Google put a scraper site and a cybersquatter at number one and two position for my company name. No problem Google, I took my business to Yahoo!. Since then Google has sent me three invitations to participate in their various programs but guess what? My eyes are open now. I am never going to trust Google again.

Google, I am sorry to say this but you disgust me.

Frank

Google
  post to Del.icio.us

Saturday, February 11, 2006

David Ogletree - SEO Advice and Internet News » Google has lost it’s edge

I found this comment via Amr's blog

Google has lost it’s edge: "The people investing in Google have no idea what the company really does or is capable of. It is the 90’s all over again. It will be ugly when it all falls down. They are spending tons of money on all kinds of projects and they have no idea if those projects will generate revenue. Everything they make they offer for free. When has that ever been a successful business model? They will always be known for search and will always be the most searched website but that is a company with one product. They give things away for free and put advertising on it. That is all they do."


I second the thoughts of David in saying that Google stock holders really don't know what they are investing in. People are preparing themselves for another depression.

Frank
  post to Del.icio.us

Friday, February 10, 2006

Search engines will do any thing to please the Chinese Government: Yahoo Writer Jailed in China | RED HERRING

RED HERRING | Yahoo Writer Jailed in China: "Internet portal Yahoo provided information about another of its members to the Chinese government, leading to the second such arrest uncovered in recent months, a journalist rights group charged on Thursday.

Reporters Without Borders said Li Zhi, a Yahoo customer and “cyberdissident,” received an eight-year prison sentence in December 2003 based on electronic records supplied by Yahoo.

The group claims 49 cyberdissidents and 32 journalists are currently in prison in China for posting articles and criticism of the authorities on the Internet. It believes that the identities of many of these people were revealed by companies like Yahoo."


This is a sad, sad day for search engines who will do just about anything to please Chinese government. Where are your morals Yahoo and Google? Where are your ethics? Dead?

Frank
  post to Del.icio.us

Google Desktop Search: The real reasons behind Google wanting to store your hard drive on its servers?

Tell everything about yourself to Google so Google can earn money and possibly some day turn you in!

EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) is coming out with a very strong warning to consumers urging them to not use the new Google Desktop Search feature as it "greatly increases the risk to consumer privacy."

With the new Google Desktop Search, your "Word documents, PDFs, spreadsheets and other text-based documents" stored on Google's servers which means you are not the only one who knows what's on your computer.

As a software engineer and professional search engine consultant I would like to draw your attention to the possible motives behind Google offering this service, based on my experience.

The new Desktop feature is not about offering users a great service. It's about Google being able to predict more efficiently what type of ads users would click on.

Predicting what ads to show to consumers
So for example, lets say Joe uses Google Desktop Search Feature and as a result has the contents of his hard drive(s) stored on Google's server. Google can then not only actively monitor what content Joe has on his computer but also what content Joe created or accessed recently. If Joe, for instance, recently created or downloaded five documents about "web hosting", Google could predict that wherever Joe goes online, "web hosting" ads would be the ones that Joe is most likely to click on. Predicting users demand in this way can help Google rake in billions at the cost of mine and your privacy.

On the other hand if a user creates documents about pregnancy, or mentions keywords about "pregnancy" in their recent documents, Google could guess that the user is most likely to click on "pregnancy" related ads.

Many people use the same password for multiple services
As a professional consultant I am surprised to see how many people use the same password for multiple services, which is a very insecure practice. Some of these passwords are shared with other people (such as a web site owner who may share his passwords with his webmaster).

People who follow such insecure practice may open their entire computers to prying eyes, thanks to Google Desktop Search.


ZDNET quotes Peter Sommers, a research fellow at LSE.
"If a law enforcement agency wants this information from Google, legally they're entitled to do that provide they comply with the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act. From a practical perspective, law enforcement agencies are always looking for places where they can get a great deal of information without much effort."



  post to Del.icio.us

Friday, February 03, 2006

GOOG, Google and GAAP

A commenter named GOOG Skeptic said on Amr's blog:

Can we talk about the discrepency between GOOG’s pro-forma shenangians and their GAAP performance? Pro-forma earnings are supposed to reflect one-off events that don’t have anything to do with the on-going performance of the company. However, in each quarter, GOOG keeps adding back an increasingly large stock based compensation expense, an expense which is certainly not a one time occurrence. After all, SBC is THE way that GOOG recruits and retains their employees (anyone who knows anyone at that company can tell you that). When you look beyond these “everything but the bad stuff” earnings and view the actual GAAP earnings, it is apparent that quarter to quarter growth has not improved at all over the past four quarters. Thoughts?
I will present my analysis soon on this.

Frank
  post to Del.icio.us

It's not Yahoo's goal to be No. 1 in Internet search???

The comments of Yahoo's CFO, Susan Decker, caused the blood to boil in me, and I am just a passionate Yahoo! fan with a blogspot blog (No crime in doing that, right?).

In case you missed the comments, Susan Decker said:

"It's not our goal to be No. 1 in Internet search. We would be very happy to maintain our market share"

I was wondering what would have been the reaction at Yahoo!, a company that is very conversative in making public statements, especially like this one.

Today, things are getting a lot clearer:

Are you kidding? Say the VPs of Yahoo! Engineering and Products, Search.
Yahoo! CFO blasted by Yahoo! Search Executives
Yahoo! responds on Digg
Yahoo! gives up quest for search dominance: Seattle
Yahoo! happy with it's share: Search Engine Lowdown

My comment on Yahoo! Blog (I couldn't post it since I kept getting objectionable content error or 500 Internal server error)

I was just appalled at Susan's comments and as I said on my blog, I am just a passionate Yahoo! fan who converted from Google after being a passionate Google lover ever since Google started. Today, my believe in Yahoo! is much stronger. Yahoo! is thinking where none of it's rivals are. It is the company of the future. Yahoo's innovations are second to none.

It really hurts the passionate fans, and the management alike when words are said that are contrary to what Yahoo's goal is.

Go Yahoo! Your fans are with you!
Frank Mash
  post to Del.icio.us

Thursday, February 02, 2006

Google's Math Gone Wrong?

I just saw this on Amr's blog:

Funny Google rounding error: "Try this search on Google: 1 - 0.9 - 0.1

the answer they give is: 1 - 0.9 - 0.1 = -2.77555756 × 10-17"


Amr rightfully points that the right answer should've been 0.

Rob has a screenshot here.
Really funny stuff!
Frank
Update: It's fixed now. The query [1 - 0.9 - 0.1] returns [0] on Google.
  post to Del.icio.us

GOOG: Google's analysis by Amr Awadallah- A Yahoo! Programmer.

I found a link to Amr's blog about Google will miss 2005-Q4 quarter revenue estimates. on Jeremy's blog. Amr definitely has some very interesting points about Goog's future performance. Also read CNN's article about Amr.

If only Jeremy would let me comment on his blog....
Frank
  post to Del.icio.us

eXTReMe Tracker